5F-ADB Wikipedia: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Erkenfara
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
K
K
Zeile 1: Zeile 1:
LC-QTOF-MS represents a significant advancement in the field of drug detection, offering higher sensitivity, specificity, and a broader spectrum of detectable substances. Despite all negative results in the point-of-care test for recreational drugs, the liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS) analysis showed that the liquid of the e-cigarette contained ADB-BUTINACA, a synthetic cannabinoid. We report a 27-year-old man who was admitted to the emergency room because of sudden [https://cannabinoidsrc4f-adb.com/ adb butinaca] headache, nausea, vertigo, red eyes and palpitations. Synthetic cannabinoids are gaining popularity globally and detection is not commonly available.<br>Data availability <br>When clinical presentation and/or initial DOA testing results are inconclusive, additional testing with LC-QTOF-MS can be valuable and is recommended. SCRAs and other NPS may not be detected by point-of-care DOA tests. In this case, the point-of-care DOA urine screening was not able to detect the synthetic cannabinoid ADB-BUTINAC<br><br>Average potency of the discriminative stimulus effects of early compounds was 0.81±0.17 mg/kg (Gatch et al., 2014), whereas the potency of a recent set was 0.09±0.03 mg/kg (Gatch et al., 2018), and the potency of the current set is 0.05±0.01 mg/k<br><br><br>These synthetic cannabinoids act adb butinaca directly at cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors as does Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) found in marijuana, but have different chemical structures unrelated to Δ9-THC, different metabolism, and often greater toxicity (Fantegrossi et al., 2014). Discriminative stimulus effects were tested in rats trained to discriminate Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (3 mg/kg, 30-min pretreatment). 5F-MDMB-PINACA (also known as 5F-ADB, 5F-ADB-PINACA), MDMB-CHIMICA, MDMB-FUBINACA, ADB-FUBINACA, and AMB-FUBINACA (also known as FUB-AMB, MMB-FUBINACA) were tested for in vivo cannabinoid-like effects to assess their abuse liabilit<br><br>Oxidation of 4′-hydroxybutyl moiety in B2 led to formation of 4′-carboxybutyl metabolite (B4) having a precursor ion of m/z 362, which was 14 Da higher than the m/z for B2 (loss of two hydrogen atoms with addition of a carbonyl group<br><br><br>The current study indicates that the test compounds produce locomotor depression similar to that of Δ9-THC, and fully substitute for the discriminative stimulus effects of Δ9-THC. In summary, these 5F-MDMB-PINACA, MDMB-CHIMICA, MDMB-FUBINACA, ADB-FUBINACA, and AMB-FUBINACA have similar abuse liability as Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and should be controlled in a similar fashion. Much of the in vivo adb butinaca testing of the synthetic cannabinoid compounds have been pre-clinical studies focused on their cannabinoid-like effects or like the present study, focused on their abuse liability. There is indication that at least some of the first-generation synthetic cannabinoids act at receptors other than cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 (Wiley et al., 2016), and a compound from the present study, 5F-MDMB-PINACA, was found to activate midbrain dopamine neurons, but not serotonin neurons (Asaoka et al., 2016<br><br>Figure 1. <br>These synthetic cannabinoids act directly at cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors as does Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) found in marijuana, but have different chemical structures unrelated to Δ9-THC, different metabolism, and often greater toxicity (Fantegrossi et al., 2014). Discriminative stimulus effects were tested in rats trained to discriminate Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (3 mg/kg, 30-min pretreatment). 5F-MDMB-PINACA (also known as 5F-ADB, 5F-ADB-PINACA), MDMB-CHIMICA, MDMB-FUBINACA, ADB-FUBINACA, and AMB-FUBINACA (also known as FUB-AMB, MMB-FUBINACA) were tested for in vivo cannabinoid-like effects to assess their abuse liabilit<br><br>Moreover, genetic makeup, physiological conditions (age, gender and ethnicity), environmental influences (diet) and pathological factors (liver diseases, diabetes, and obesity) would further complicate the metabolism of drug<br><br>There is indication that at least some of the first-generation synthetic cannabinoids act at receptors other than cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 (Wiley et al., 2016), and a compound from the present study, 5F-MDMB-PINACA, was found to activate midbrain dopamine neurons, but not serotonin neurons (Asaoka et al., 2016<br><br>4. Drugs <br>The purpose of the present study was to assess the abuse liability of 5F-MDMB-PINACA, MDMB-CHIMICA, MDMB-FUBINACA, ADB-FUBINACA, and AMB-FUBINACA. The findings produce an apparent paradox, since CPP and self-administration predict with high reliability the likelihood that a compound will be abused by humans, and cannabinoids are well-known to produce active drug-seeking in humans. Drug discrimination is a well-known animal model of the subjective effects of drugs and correlates well with abuse liability (Young 2009; Horton et al. 2013). Assessment of abuse liability is based on several factors, including chemical structure, pharmacological mechanism of action, and finally, subjective and reinforcing behavioral effects (FDA, 2010; Swedberg, 2013).<br>Michael B Gat
+
Taken together these data further confirmed the structure elucidation of B16. The precursor ion m/z 276 (B1) detected, which was 74 Da lower than that for the 4F-MDMB-BINACA ester hydrolysis metabolite (B22), indicated N-dealkylation of B22. The precursor ion m/z 348 and product ion detected at m/z 217 (B2) identified was 2 Da less than the 4F-MDMB-BINACA ester hydrolysis metabolite (B22), indicating oxidative defluorination (loss of fluorine with addition of hydroxy [https://cannabinoidsrc4f-adb.com/ adb butinaca] group<br><br><br>Due to the unknown toxicity of newly emerging SCRAs, forensic assessments of cases involving these substances are challenging. According to the reported cases and reviews of the scientific literature, concurrent ethanol consumption should amplify the toxicity of SCRAs. The concentration of 4F-MDMB-BINACA in the postmortem blood was 2.50 and 2.34 ng/mL, and blood alcohol concentration was 2.11 and 2.49 g/L, respectively. Two fatal cases are reported caused by simultaneous consumption of 4F-MDMB-BINACA and ethanol.<br>Fig. 2. <br>The precursor ion m/z 396 (B10, B12/B15) was 32 Da higher than the parent drug, 4F-MDMB-BINACA, suggesting the addition of two hydroxy groups. All the below explanations for transformations into metabolites are based on the data shown in Fig. Metabolites were identified according to their precursor ions, product ions, and fragmentation patterns (Fig. 1). Traditional in-vivo metabolism studies to generate human metabolites of drugs relied heavily on the use of whole animal model systems, which are expensive, limited by drug administration amount, influenced by species variation and faced by many ethical issues. Eight in-vivo metabolites tentatively identified were mainly products of ester hydrolysis with or without additional dehydrogenation, N-dealkylation, monohydroxylation and oxidative defluorination with further oxidation to butanoic acid.<br>Fig. 1. <br>This outcome was anticipated since CES-mediated hydrolysis is commonly adb butinaca reported as the major metabolic pathway among the SCBs impacting the terminal ester group . Glucosides and sulfate metabolites have been reported with other SCBs where C. From these three samples, sample 2 contained only an ester hydrolysis metabolite (m/z 350). Both ester hydrolysis followed by oxidative defluorination to butanoic acid (B4, m/z 362) and monohydroxylation at tert-leucine moiety (B8, m/z 366) metabolites were found in 16/20 urine samples (Table 2). A In-vitro metabolites observed in common among respective seven most abundant metabolites in b C. The product ion detected at m/z 235, indicating loss of sulfate, confirmed the identity of the sulfation metabolite.<br>Fungus C. elegans <br>Methyl (2S)-2-([1-(4-fluorobutyl)-1H-indazole-3-carbonyl]amino)-3,3-dimethylbutanoate (4F-MDMB-BINACA, 4F-MDMB-BUTINACA or 4F-ADB), found in numerous SCB product seizures, has been reported by various law enforcement since 2018 . However, most of the SCBs are full agonists at CB1 and CB2 receptors, having a higher risk of undesirable side effects when compared to THC which is a partial agonist . Synthetic cannabinoids (SCBs) are agonists at cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) and type 2 (CB2), where they elicit their main effect<br><br><br>§ (3) of the Hungarian act of Forensic Experts (2016.XXIX), the data of the reported case can be utilized freely for scientific and educational purposes without special ethical permission. These results indicate that the simultaneous intoxication of SCRA and ethanol directly and exclusively caused the death of the two victims. The victims did not have any significant diseases that could have contributed to the outcome. Very limited data are available in the scientific literature about the possible effects of the combined consumption of SCRAs and ethanol. Several case reports describe that the presence of a little ng/mL (0.37–4.1) of SCRAs and a high—but not lethal—concentration of ethanol (1.45–2.7 g/L) directly and exclusively contributed to the death of the victim [24–27] (Table 2). The fact that 4F-MDMB-BINACA was not detected in postmortem urine samples is partly explained by the high rate of hepatic metabolism of SCRAs [11, 14, 22], but also suggests that the victims consumed 4F-MDMB-BINACA shortly before their death<br><br><br>Locomotor activity in mice was tested to screen for locomotor depressant effects and to identify behaviorally-active dose ranges and times of peak effect. Previous studies have demonstrated that these compounds have chemical structures similar to synthetic cannabinoids known to have substantial abuse liability and act at the CB1 receptor. Tremors were not observed following AMB-FUBINACA during the drug discrimination study, but the maximum dose tested was only 0.1 mg/kg, which is 10-fold lower than the dose that produced tremors in the mice. AMB-FUBINACA has been implicated in severe adverse effects in recreational users (Adams et al., 2017; Hamilton et al., 2017), which suggests that the range between behaviorally active and toxic doses of AMB-FUBINACA is narrow. Following that line of reasoning, it should also be noted that some of the more recent compounds produced non-linear dose-effect curves and one compound produced an inverted U-shaped dose-effect, such that intermediate dose fully substituted, but higher doses did not (Gatch and Forster, 2018). All of the compounds identified as available on the recreational market and submitted to our laboratory by the US Drug Enforcement Agency for testing have fully substituted at some dose (Gatch and Forster 2014, 2015, 2016, 2018); however; it is important to note that not all structural congeners are active (Wiley et al., 2012

Version vom 15. Juni 2026, 17:15 Uhr

Taken together these data further confirmed the structure elucidation of B16. The precursor ion m/z 276 (B1) detected, which was 74 Da lower than that for the 4F-MDMB-BINACA ester hydrolysis metabolite (B22), indicated N-dealkylation of B22. The precursor ion m/z 348 and product ion detected at m/z 217 (B2) identified was 2 Da less than the 4F-MDMB-BINACA ester hydrolysis metabolite (B22), indicating oxidative defluorination (loss of fluorine with addition of hydroxy adb butinaca group


Due to the unknown toxicity of newly emerging SCRAs, forensic assessments of cases involving these substances are challenging. According to the reported cases and reviews of the scientific literature, concurrent ethanol consumption should amplify the toxicity of SCRAs. The concentration of 4F-MDMB-BINACA in the postmortem blood was 2.50 and 2.34 ng/mL, and blood alcohol concentration was 2.11 and 2.49 g/L, respectively. Two fatal cases are reported caused by simultaneous consumption of 4F-MDMB-BINACA and ethanol.
Fig. 2.
The precursor ion m/z 396 (B10, B12/B15) was 32 Da higher than the parent drug, 4F-MDMB-BINACA, suggesting the addition of two hydroxy groups. All the below explanations for transformations into metabolites are based on the data shown in Fig. Metabolites were identified according to their precursor ions, product ions, and fragmentation patterns (Fig. 1). Traditional in-vivo metabolism studies to generate human metabolites of drugs relied heavily on the use of whole animal model systems, which are expensive, limited by drug administration amount, influenced by species variation and faced by many ethical issues. Eight in-vivo metabolites tentatively identified were mainly products of ester hydrolysis with or without additional dehydrogenation, N-dealkylation, monohydroxylation and oxidative defluorination with further oxidation to butanoic acid.
Fig. 1.
This outcome was anticipated since CES-mediated hydrolysis is commonly adb butinaca reported as the major metabolic pathway among the SCBs impacting the terminal ester group . Glucosides and sulfate metabolites have been reported with other SCBs where C. From these three samples, sample 2 contained only an ester hydrolysis metabolite (m/z 350). Both ester hydrolysis followed by oxidative defluorination to butanoic acid (B4, m/z 362) and monohydroxylation at tert-leucine moiety (B8, m/z 366) metabolites were found in 16/20 urine samples (Table 2). A In-vitro metabolites observed in common among respective seven most abundant metabolites in b C. The product ion detected at m/z 235, indicating loss of sulfate, confirmed the identity of the sulfation metabolite.
Fungus C. elegans
Methyl (2S)-2-([1-(4-fluorobutyl)-1H-indazole-3-carbonyl]amino)-3,3-dimethylbutanoate (4F-MDMB-BINACA, 4F-MDMB-BUTINACA or 4F-ADB), found in numerous SCB product seizures, has been reported by various law enforcement since 2018 . However, most of the SCBs are full agonists at CB1 and CB2 receptors, having a higher risk of undesirable side effects when compared to THC which is a partial agonist . Synthetic cannabinoids (SCBs) are agonists at cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) and type 2 (CB2), where they elicit their main effect


§ (3) of the Hungarian act of Forensic Experts (2016.XXIX), the data of the reported case can be utilized freely for scientific and educational purposes without special ethical permission. These results indicate that the simultaneous intoxication of SCRA and ethanol directly and exclusively caused the death of the two victims. The victims did not have any significant diseases that could have contributed to the outcome. Very limited data are available in the scientific literature about the possible effects of the combined consumption of SCRAs and ethanol. Several case reports describe that the presence of a little ng/mL (0.37–4.1) of SCRAs and a high—but not lethal—concentration of ethanol (1.45–2.7 g/L) directly and exclusively contributed to the death of the victim [24–27] (Table 2). The fact that 4F-MDMB-BINACA was not detected in postmortem urine samples is partly explained by the high rate of hepatic metabolism of SCRAs [11, 14, 22], but also suggests that the victims consumed 4F-MDMB-BINACA shortly before their death


Locomotor activity in mice was tested to screen for locomotor depressant effects and to identify behaviorally-active dose ranges and times of peak effect. Previous studies have demonstrated that these compounds have chemical structures similar to synthetic cannabinoids known to have substantial abuse liability and act at the CB1 receptor. Tremors were not observed following AMB-FUBINACA during the drug discrimination study, but the maximum dose tested was only 0.1 mg/kg, which is 10-fold lower than the dose that produced tremors in the mice. AMB-FUBINACA has been implicated in severe adverse effects in recreational users (Adams et al., 2017; Hamilton et al., 2017), which suggests that the range between behaviorally active and toxic doses of AMB-FUBINACA is narrow. Following that line of reasoning, it should also be noted that some of the more recent compounds produced non-linear dose-effect curves and one compound produced an inverted U-shaped dose-effect, such that intermediate dose fully substituted, but higher doses did not (Gatch and Forster, 2018). All of the compounds identified as available on the recreational market and submitted to our laboratory by the US Drug Enforcement Agency for testing have fully substituted at some dose (Gatch and Forster 2014, 2015, 2016, 2018); however; it is important to note that not all structural congeners are active (Wiley et al., 2012